Graham Clarke wrote:
>
> I have been in touch with the PFA on this subject. No detail of already
> approved mods was offered, just a suggestion that details be submitted
> details for approval.
Very much the same response I got at the April seminar when I asked
Francis what was intended to be a leading question about making existing
approved mods more public. Do the PFA mind in principle, or just wish to
avoid a workload being the information exchange for many different bulder
groups ? I would have thought they would welcome re-use of approved mods
as being less work than appraisal and debugging of a host of similar but
different mods.
Incidentally, when I registered the project with the PFA I got a report
on the Permit trials of G-YURO. Since then the factory has changed the
kit quite a bit and issued a number of mods. Presumably the target
approved design for which a Permit will be issued automatically moves
every time the factory makes a change or statement, to the whole builder
group or a community, but I don't recollect having read that anywhere ...
> IMHO that is making more work than necessary for everybody. So yes
> please- lets have a datbase, with drawings Ron.
Definitely !
John Cliff
#0259
|