europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Rudder pedal crank conflicts

Subject: Rudder pedal crank conflicts
From: Graham Clarke <gemin@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 9 Dec 1995 00:35:23
There are two possible conflicts builders should be aware off before 
"freezing in" the rudder pedal mountings and floor panels.

1) the stainless steel firewall mod. seems to have been designed as if it 
the cranks were not there, as they pass through the plane of the 
suggested design. To clear them, large unfillable holes are needed thus 
defeating the object of a firewall. There seems to be no reason why a 
one-piece plate(with just a bend at top and bottom) should not be fitted 
in the plane of the vertical members of the landing gear frame (just in 
front of the bungee cord) where there is no conflict. The only holes 
needed are for the lugs and cables. It has to be divided at the middle, 
of course to get it in , as with the upper two plates of the supplied 
design.

2) This applies to the Rotax 912 engine. The rudder cranks must clear 
adequately and certainly not penetrate the following space:  

Centred on the lower lugs, extend a cone with starting diameter 1 3/4"  
forward for 3/4" to a diameter of 2". (This takes you to the lugs of the 
engine frame). The 3/4" dimension will decrease somewhat when the rubbers 
are compressed.  There is precious little room here (if any) and it is 
pretty disastrous if you have to remove the floors.  You might get some 
alleviation by just shimming the base of the tufnol pedal bearings  to 
move the pedals upwards, and other gymnastics, like using smaller 
washers, shorter sleeves, smaller thimbles and filing bolt heads etc. on 
the cable attachment.

Graham Clarke G-EMIN No.83



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>