Subject: | avionics-any advice/bargains |
---|---|
From: | Graham Singleton <100421.2123@compuserve.com> |
Date: | Mon, 24 Nov 1997 20:01:03 |
>> These things are going to consume energy to drive them, and that energy has to come either directly or indirectly from the engine. So! With respect Graham. Doesnt that make the arguement for suckers?<< Yes it does (;-) Theoretically a well designed sucker should use less energy than the alternator. No reason why it shouldn't be fitted inside the airplane either. Mode C is a definite advantage, you get much more helpful responses from air traffic people. Graham |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Pilot and cabin measures, Graham Singleton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Wing Tip Shape, Miles McCallum |
Previous by Thread: | avionics-any advice/bargains, BRYNALL |
Next by Thread: | Re: avionics-any advice/bargains, Jerry |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |