Subject: | Re: Fuel flow |
---|---|
From: | Nigel Charles <72016.3721@compuserve.com> |
Date: | Tue, 30 Jul 2002 05:11:40 |
Message text written by "LTS" >We are asking elba to look at the Flowscan units as an alternative as they do indeed seem to cause less restriction. Beware all conventional senders reduce fuel flow. < I seem to remember the Floscan is documented as only creating a pressure drop of 0.16psi at 15gall/hr so will be even less significant at our fuel flows. To handle its max of 30gall/hr the restriction in the line will be minimal at say 3 gall/hr. It is rated at 2-3% error which is a great improvement on any fuel gauging system. Nigel Charles |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: First Flight ZU-COY, R . C . Harrison |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Fuel flow, Rob Huntington |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Fuel flow, LTS |
Next by Thread: | Re: Fuel flow, Rob Huntington |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |