mikenjulie.parkin@btopenworld.com wrote:
>
>Yes, but I wouldn't choose a Rotax again if it had a known list of
>weaknesses - while at the same time the Subaru was free of similar
>weaknesses.
>
>Is that illogical?
>
>LSD is a feature here - not the hallucogenic type.
>
>And a Merry Christmas to all.
>
>MP
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "rmrrick" <rmrrick@aol.com>
>To: <europa-list@matronics.com>
>Subject: Re: Europa-List: FW: CS Prop Failure (a cautionary tale)
>
>
>
>
>>
>>Dear Mike
>>
>>I'm sorry that your mind boggles. I have chosen a 912S, having never
>>having owned a Subaru for example, but I would choose a Rota x again for
>>what I consider to be good reasons having done a little research. Is
>>this illogical?
>>
>>All the best and a very happy Xmas to one and all.
>>
>>Rick Morris
>>
>>G-RIKS 912S Tri gear (Arplast PV50).
>>
>>
>>
>>>You have never owned an Airmaster???? - But you would still choose an
>>>Arplast over an Airmaster -----the mind boggles.
>>>
>>>MP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
The initial cost, blade effiency and geographic support are three
negatives in my mind......
Either way no one should accuse Mark, of all people, of not having
carefully considered his decision.
Rick
|