europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Europa-List: SV: Re: SV: fuel flow and return line status

Subject: Re: Europa-List: SV: Re: SV: fuel flow and return line status
From: John Heykoop <john.heykoop@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:50:13

Hi Clive

The k factor of 17030 you are using for your single transducer setup is roughly
53 percent of the standard Flowscan k factor of 32000. 

On the strength of that I have just set the initial k factor of new my red cube
transducer to 36000 (53 percent of the standard red cube k factor of 68000).
I switched on the boost pump and guess what - the indicated fuel flow is 
4ltrs/hr,
exactly the same as yours.

Many thanks for posting this information, it will give me a head start when I 
get
my Europa back in the air. My k factor will, of course, need further fine tuning
but it is good to start off with an initial k factor that is broadly correct.

Regards

John
G-JHKP mono
(Rotax 912ULS with single red cube transducer fuel flow measurement)


On 15 Mar 2013, at 21:13, "Clives email" <clive.maf@googlemail.com> wrote:

> 
> Hi Svein,
> 
> Thanks for your reply.  I regret that the 9lit/hr indicated figure I gave in
> my last email is actually wrong - 9lit/hr is indicated with the 912ULS
> running at idle and with boost pump 'on'.  I just checked the boost
> pump-only flow rate (my a/c is in the garage next door for the winter), and
> it reads just over 4Lit/hr with a K factor of 17030 - which I think all
> tallies rather well with your comments about 'spot' flow rates vs totalised
> flow rates and the 9 lit/hr figures you have found.  My K factor will be
> specific to the sensor/Stratomaster setup of course, other combinations may
> easily have different K factors.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> Clive.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of Sidsel & Svein
> Johnsen
> Sent: 15 March 2013 18:19
> To: europa-list@matronics.com
> Subject: SV: Europa-List: SV: Re: SV: fuel flow and return line status
> 
> --> <sidsel.svein@oslo.online.no>
> 
> Hello Clive,
> 
>> Thinking more about the single fuel flow setup - would you agree that 
>> another way of checking the restrictor is not blocked, is simply to
> monitor
>> that there IS fuel flow without the engine running but with the boost 
>> pump running?  I get around 9L/hr.
>> 
>> Assuming the float chambers are full and there are no external leaks, 
>> not sure where else fuel can go if it is not being consumed by a 
>> running
> engine. . .
>> 
>> Clive
>> 
> 
> Yes, I do agree.  This is effectively the same as I will do with my
> two-sender set-up :  momentarily switch off the feed (total) flow sender and
> switch the return flow sender to the feed input as a single sender.
> 
> Your 9L/hr return flow is close to what I measured when I, too, had a system
> with only one sender - I got approx. 10L/hr.  However, if you have adjusted
> the k-factor to get a reasonably good totalizer function (i.e. adjusted the
> k-factor so that the displayed fuel consumed on an average flight is
> approximately correct), your actual return flow is higher than the displayed
> flow, of course.
> 
> Regards,
> Svein
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>