I'm not convinced of that, since the paint density is constant throughout an
d the moment arm is much much longer for the paint on the fin than on the co
wls.
I would expect the cg to move rearward slightly....how much I'd have no idea
.
Cheers,
Pete
a239
> On Dec 27, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Richard Wheelwright <rpwheelwright@yahoo.co.u
k> wrote:
>
> Fred
> If you know the wight of your finished aircraft and then paint it, it
will balance out exactly the same but be heaver, there should be no shift u
nless you put all the paint on the rear fin and non on the cowls. I hope I h
ave understood your Question.
>
> ===================
> Richard Wheelwright
> ===================
>
> From: Fred Klein <fklein@orcasonline.com>
> To: europa-list@matronics.com
> Sent: Friday, 27 December 2013, 17:09
> Subject: Europa-List: Weight & Balance
>
>
> I'm wondering if there's a mono-builder out there who has data from his (o
r her?) C of G calculations which would reveal how much the C of G shifts as
a consequence of finish painting?
>
> In other words, I'm wondering if I have an otherwise complete aircraft in p
rimer and do a preliminary C of G calculation, how much of a shift should I e
stimate will occur when painting is complete?
>
> on" sp; &matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List" target=
"_blank">http://www.matronicsttp://forums.matronics.com/"; target="_blank">
http://forums.matronics.com<================
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3
D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
|