europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The great breaker debate . . .Yeahbut.....

Subject: Re: The great breaker debate . . .Yeahbut.....
From: Robert L. Nuckolls III <nuckolls@aeroelectric.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 10:38:23
 <19971009.204841.4863.0.GASobek@juno.com>


>   I don't want to start another great debate over the fuse Vs Breaker
>concept, but I have to take exception to your example. 
>
>   First of all, it would appear from your statements that you're talking
>about UNMANNED spacecraft. I to beleive that fuses in this type of
>installation is the correct approach. But there are times when an
>intermittent short that opens a critical circuits breaker might result in
>the pilots safe return with the ability to reset that breaker. I agree
>that service work should not be performed in the cockpit while flying,
>but I would rather have the ability to reset a breaker IF I NEED TO, and
>it doesn't interferr with the control of the aircraft. Just my opinion.

   Let's try an ON-LINE FMEA (failure mode effects analysis). Over the
   next 24 hours, I'd like for people to post their response to the following
   questions:

   (1) Name one item of electrical equipment critical to safe completion
       of flight . . . or an item who's failure presents an immediate
       hazard to completion of flight.

   (2) List the ways in which this device or system might fail.

   (3) How will each of these failures become obvious to the pilot.

    Tomorrow, I'll carry the analysis of each response to the next step.
    This is just the kind of process we do in the "big" airplane business;
    it's a good exercise to know . . .


    Regards,

    Bob . . . 
    AeroElectric Connection
                   ////
                  (o o)
    |                               |
    |  Go ahead, make my day . . .  |
    |   Show me where I'm wrong.    |
      <http://www.aeroelectric.com>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>