Subject: | RE: Instruments |
---|---|
From: | Graham Singleton <grasingleton@avnet.co.uk> |
Date: | Tue, 6 Feb 2001 23:03:22 |
>I still have conventional instruments each side of the RMI but it was >quite surprising how quickly I just started using the RMI. One quick >glance gives me everything I >need. I know a couple of other people who have said the same thing. I >originally planned on putting the RMI in the VSI space on the panel for >ZK-TSK but am now moving it up to the centre. >I am also planning on slaving off serial data from my engine scanner to >create separate displays for key data. > >>> The UK PFA will not allow an electrical instrument for the primary > functions. >I agree with them there which is why the ASI and Altimeter are still there >as mechanicals but now perform backup functions rather than act as primaries. >Tony I must confess I prefer bar graphs to numbers.eg Its very easy to scan 4 CHTs side by side and spot a rogue cylinder. I still wish we had AoA as a primary flight instrument. Much better than ASI. (sorry if you're fed up of hearing that bleat.) Graham |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Rudder Cable Guides, TroyMaynor |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Instruments, Shaun Simpkins |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Instruments, Tony Renshaw |
Next by Thread: | Re: Instruments, Shaun Simpkins |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |