europa-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Tailplane mass balance stops

Subject: Re: Tailplane mass balance stops
From: Steve Hagar <hagargs@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 20:24:07
Cleve:

I am using the reference on page 18-7 for installing the tail plane push
rod. 
Where they say 6 deg trailing edge down and 14 up  to ensure that the final
movement of the tailplanes will result in a maximum of 13 and -5.

Steve
A143
Mesa AZ

> [Original Message]
> From: <clevelee@cswebmail.com>
> Cc: <europa@avnet.co.uk>; <hagargs@earthlink.net>
 > Date: 1/30/02 4:48:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Tailplane mass balance stops
>
> Steve,
> My XS manual only calls for 4 degrees down.  That 5th degree would cause
a similar problem for me.
> 
> Is there something I should know??
> 
> Cleve Lee
> A198 Mono XS
> 
> 
>On Mon, 28 January 2002, "Dave Simpson" wrote:
>
> 
>> Mine did this too.  I simply machined a 
>> part of the mass balance away, so that it looks rather like a truncated cone
at 
>> the forward end. Then it cleared OK.
>>   ----- Original Message -----
>>   From: <hagargs@earthlink.net> Steve Hagar
>>   Subject: Tailplane mass balance stops
>>
>>   I'm up to another case of looking for someone who has been in a similar 
>>   "been there done that" situation. I am in the process of putting in the 
>>   bulkhead and stops for the tail plane mass balance.  During the first 
>>   iteration, (setup as described in the manual), things did not pan out as 
>>   expected (typical). The end result was that the aircraft nose down travel

>>   (balance up) exceeded limits of bulkheads.
>>   
>>   The second iteration  involved getting rid of the big fat wooden 
>>   dowel and rubber hose stop (1.5" dia) and replacing them with a UHMW type

>>   material stop around the cross bolt with a dia of .5" to get the mass 
>> weight

>>   down lower to start with. At this point the weight  stops about 1.2" 
>>   above the tailplane push tube in its lowered position. The end result was
that 
>>   it looked close, though the next step was to get technical and actually lay

>>   the top of the aircraft on the whole mess before continuing.
>>   
>>   With the top on, the weight smacks the top of the fuselage being a 
>>   little over a degree short of the minimum amount required  of nose down 
>>   travel. Granted only 5 degrees is called for but I am short over 
>>   20%.   I see my direction now as doing some creative machining 
>>   of the steel weights when it comes time for metal removal and balancing to
get 
>>   clearances. Or to do some beefing up of the lower stop to allow the  
>>   weight to get even closer to the tube at its bottom travel.
>>   
>>   Any "out of the box" insights would be much appreciated.
>>   
>>   Steve Hagar
>>   A143
>>   Mesa,  AZ
>>   
>>   --- Steve Hagar --- hagargs@earthlink.net
>>   
> 
> 
> ___________________________________________________
> The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
>  Better!  Faster! More Powerful!
>  250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
>  http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/
> 
> 
> 
> 


--- Steve Hagar
--- hagargs@earthlink.net



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>