| Subject: | Re: Runway length |
|---|---|
| From: | Alexander P. de C. Kaarsberg <kaarsber@terra.com.br> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Mar 2002 08:41:43 |
......but the diesel is said to compare with 150 hp engines in performance due to the higher bottom-end torque, so i'd expect need for less runway? Alex, #529 KarkelB@aol.com wrote: >mmmm....... wilksch WAM120 with MT prop.The two are the heaviest in their >respective categories. I reckon you will need a good length of the runway to >get airbourne!!! > > karim. ># 420 > > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Runway length, KarkelB |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Digital Scales, Roger Mills |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Runway length, KarkelB |
| Next by Thread: | Runway length, Paul Atkinson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |