Subject: | Re: Runway length |
---|---|
From: | Graham Singleton <grasingleton@avnet.co.uk> |
Date: | Mon, 11 Mar 2002 23:55:41 |
>mmmm....... wilksch WAM120 with MT prop.The two are the heaviest in their >respective categories. I reckon you will need a good length of the runway to >get airbourne!!! > > karim. ># 420 Not true. When I flew it in the early days, derated to about 80 bhp, we were off the ground, up to 6 feet altitude !?! back down again and stopped in about 600 meters. We had to, it was foggy. Mark was very keen to fly in the last century and it was 4 PM on 31 December 1999. That was a busy week {?:-) Graham |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Change this.. change that... do some more, Graham Singleton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Insulating fuel lines, Graham Singleton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Runway length, David Watts |
Next by Thread: | Re: Runway length, Nigel Charles |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |