Karl, The SR3000 is a very recent Woodcomp output with first production
props coming out this year, so archives won't be much help directly. However
nearly all you find on their SR2000 will apply. Currently the blades are
identical, although Woodcomp are working on a higher twist version to
optimise performance for faster planes than the 100+ knots that the SR2000
was designed for (which doesn't stop my SR2000 managing 160 kts with my
914). The current differences between SR2000 and 3000 are a totally
redesigned hub which cycles much faster,( like 3 secs instead of 14), is
likely to be more durable and allows feathering or indeed reverse thrust if
you choose those options. The Europa Club contingent of 12 who visited the
factory were thoroughly impressed with the design and quality. Regards,
David Joyce
----- Original Message -----
From: "KARL HEINDL" <kheindl@msn.com>
Subject: Re: Europa-List: Propellers
>
>
> Sven and Fred,
>
> Thank you for your reply. I will try the archives but I think the SR3000
> with constant speed must be a very recent option. With the trigear
clearance
> should't be a problem if I were to choose the 1700mm, but I don't really
> know at this point. I know in theory there could be a little more noise,
but
> is that a problem ? Weight is important to me as my empty cg is already
> quite far forward.
> Actually, I find the cockpit noise quite loud with my headphones off, but
> who knows how much of that is wind, engine, or propeller noise. Another
> consideration is reduced drag when in glider mode.
> According to Bryan Allsop the 3-blade SR2000 is much smoother than the WD
he
> had previously.
> I have all winter to think about it.
>
> Karl
>
>
> >From: "Sven den Boer" <svendenboer@quicknet.nl>
> >Reply-To: europa-list@matronics.com
> >To: <europa-list@matronics.com>
> >Subject: Re: Europa-List: Propellers
> >Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:16:28 +0100
> >
> ><svendenboer@quicknet.nl>
> >
> >Karl
> >
> >SR 3000 seems good choice to me, will fit one myself early next year.
> >Beautifully crafted piece of prop I bought.
> >3 blades save noise and vibration and there is always the nice 2/3 blade
> >compare on required diameter.
> >With a monowheel you definately would like to have some ground clearance.
> >I suggest you also check the archives, loads of stuff on props...
> >
> >Cheers
> >
> >Sven den Boer
> >A168
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "KARL HEINDL" <kheindl@msn.com>
> >To: <europa-list@matronics.com>
> >Subject: Europa-List: Propellers
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Propeller Experts !!
> > >
> > > I wish to upgrade to a CS prop with full feather option, the main
reason
> > > being the feathering capability. The obvious choice for many is the
> > > Airmaster AP332. Now the Woodcomp SR3000 has the same options, and I
> > > believe
> > > is a lot cheaper. In addition it has the option for a 2 or 3-bladed
> > > propeller. My question is this :
> > > What are the pros and cons between 2 and 3 blades, apart from the
> > > considerable weight saving of 4 kg. Why are we all using 3-bladed Warp
> > > Drives ? The Katana, which is a similar but much heavier aircraft uses
a
> > > 2-bladed CS Hoffmann on a Rotax 912.
> > >
> > > Any ideas ?
> > >
> > > Karl
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> "Fantastic service... saves a lot of time for me... I only have to go to
one page."
> http://www.doctors.net.uk/journalwatch
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
>
|