Think I'll go with the nutplate idea. Thanks for the input.
Tony Renshaw
On 15/09/2011, at 3:03 AM, Greg Fuchs wrote:
> AH HAHAHA!!! LOL. So true!!! Murphy is a very strong force. This is for
> Jims statement :) ......and this is for Murphy :P
>
> I am still wrestling with this decision as well, and keep trying to think of
> a way to restore more strength so as not to have to bond...such as large
> overlaps, and a sliding fit with overlapping glass used as bonds on the
> sides, but unattatched (or something like that).
> No conclusions yet...sorry. Just felt like piping in with interest in the
> subject, even with the lack of gameplan and to hack on ol' Murph :)
>
> Greg Fuchs
>
> _____
>
> From: owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com
> [mailto:owner-europa-list-server@matronics.com] On Behalf Of
> jimpuglise@comcast.net
>
> Tony-
>
> You need to keep our friend Murphy in mind. "If it can't possibly break, it
> will." On the other hand, if you put in a couple of nut plates and screw
> them on, you will never need to remove them. This is the second corollary
> to Murphy's Law. "Any part that is easily accessible will not break."
>
> Jim Puglise
> A238
>
>
> _____
>
> From: "Tony Renshaw" <tonyrenshaw268@gmail.com>
> Hi,
> I am of two minds whether to screw or bond on my door mech coverplates.
> Finally, I am satisfied I have done a good job in there, so am wondering
> whether returning the original strength might have some merit. I realize to
> redux them in place creates quite a problem if I need to get in there, but
> in reality what is the chances. Any advice much appreciat
> &nbs=======================
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|